Through to to arrive on the research, participants finished composed told agree. Professionals was basically seated within a computer and you can expected accomplish a beneficial survey, which included a review off identification and you will inquiries examining romantic companion being compatible. As with the prior degree, grandiose narcissism is actually assessed with the Narcissistic Character Collection (NPI ? = .86, Yards = , SD = seven.20) and you can Large Five character traits toward Larger Five Directory (BFI) . To possess neuroticism, ? = .82; Meters = dos.77, SD = 0.80; having extraversion, ? = .84, M = step three.46, SD = 0.72; to own visibility to play equestriansingles profiles, ? = .75, M = 3.55, SD = 0.58; to have conscientiousness, ? = .76; Meters = 3.67, SD = 0.56; and for agreeableness, ? = .73, M = 3.97, SD = 0.51.
Which questionnaire wasn’t useful investigation because it is actually area of safety tale. Players have been informed the pointers it provided will be used to complement him or her with some one for the campus that has equivalent appeal. Ultimately, sex, years, and you may relationship status was indeed assessed.
Following process detail by detail by the Parker and you can Burkley , people had been 2nd found an image of a goal individual and you can advised one to predicated on its previous solutions, he has “comparable passion” with this specific address. The ladies seen an image of the male target and men seen a picture of a lady target. Such pictures had been pre-examined by a beneficial ple because of their level of elegance playing with a great 10-point scale, such that step 1 = really unattractive and you will 10 = extremely attractive. The newest imply rating to your men images was 6.62 (SD = step one.86) and mean score for ladies images is actually eight.03 (SD = step 1.29). Such as Parker and you can Burkley, i also asked people several questions relating to the latest participant’s interest in the target, however, our built variables was in fact precisely the items that examined partner poaching specifically. Answers have been made on the 5-area bills in a way that step one = most unlikely and you may 5 = more than likely. The things were an excellent) “Exactly how likely could you end up being to follow this person to possess a beneficial dating?” (Meters = dos.43, SD = step one.28), and you will b) “Just how more than likely could you end up being and make aside using this type of personal?” (Yards = 2.38, SD = step 1.34). We in addition to examined the newest the total amount to which the brand new new member located the target attractive playing with good 5-point measure in a fashion that step 1 = very unattractive and you can 5 = most glamorous (M = 3.76, SD = step one.15).
I very first established all of the details just before calculating analyses. We following computed correlations anywhere between predictor/manage parameters (the big Five variables) and you will consequences details, that are demonstrated within the Desk 6. Grandiose narcissism was correlated having a greater probability of kissing on address, but not with choosing the target attractive otherwise pursuing the address getting a relationship.
Participants was at random allotted to a description of address since the “single” otherwise “in a relationship” and you will was basically following asked to take a preliminary questionnaire with the number of notice he’s on the target
We then joined variables to the a beneficial regression model; primary parameters regarding participants’ relationship status, target matchmaking standing, sex, and you may NPI score had been joined towards 1 (managing to possess Huge Five parameters), all one or two-means affairs certainly one of first variables had been inserted to your 2, all of the about three-ways relations certainly one of no. 1 details was indeed inserted with the Step three, while the four-ways communication certainly first parameters is actually entered on Step. Given that nothing of your own four-ways relationships hit statistical advantages, Step 3 analyses are reported within the Table eight.
So you can get the prospective glamorous, simply head effects to own sex and you will a participants’ relationship position have been significant. People was prone to select the address glamorous than lady, and you may singles was basically likely to discover target glamorous than affixed people. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a good predictor of finding the goal glamorous generally (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and you can grandiose narcissists did not come across connected plans as more glamorous than unattached objectives (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).